Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sub-Driver
However, her conduct does not seem to rise to the level of indictable crime, because she did not set up and use the server with the legally requisite criminal intent or even with “gross negligence,” as it has been defined in relevant case law.

Here is where they have it wrong - DEAD WRONG. No "criminal intent" - or ANY intent - is required to establish violation of the "Federal Records Act". She "failed to take care" of public documents, period in a grossly negligent way, which is indicative of why her IT guy is getting immunity and/or pleading the fifth.

21 posted on 07/02/2016 6:13:21 AM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SERKIT

We don’t need to look into that mess andy further, seems we have all the ammunition needed to put her fat ass behind bars. The problem is she is a demodummie and it will not happen. Had she been a conservative she would already BE in jail.


22 posted on 07/02/2016 6:53:06 AM PDT by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson