That is going around and I buy it except or the fact that the special prosecute simply presents the FBI charges and evidence to the Grand Jury for indictment. There is no delay. The case is investigated and the FBI refers for prosecution. The SP picks up the file, calls the witnesses and presents evidence to the Grand Jury. They indict or not indict. She has not prepared for trial any more that he would have. The simple criminal issue is — did she have unsecured server at her house exposed and in fact hacked? and it was an obvious crime for each government document to appear on that server. This is not Rocket Science. They only had 12 FBI agents on that aspect of her criminal activity. I think they wrap it up today. She will take the 5th or lie ,which is a separate Federal crime. Over 130 agents have worked on her taking bribes both directly into her bank account ( from China on the WTO sellout) and through the “foundation” .The Way that worked was the entity seeking favors gave money to a Canadian front “foundation” . Under Canadian Law, the donor may not be revealed. Then the Canadian straw man sent money to the clinton foundation in huge bundled amounts. This washed out the crooked donor names . Then Hillary ,after the money was paid, did the requested deed. Many of the government document emails that she destroyed ( another crime) dealt with the quid pro quo. Some emails probably were to her daughter and her husband as well as Sid Bloomenthal. This IMO was the reason to hide the server to begin with. Note that Bill Clinton was part of the corrupt scheme by doing the scam speeches. He is up to his eye balls and panicked and stalked Loretta Lynch to Phoenix and tried to put the fix in. It was exposed and blew up.
I think it is worthwhile to add in the violations of SAP spaces within the State Department. In order to have phone and email outside of government accountability, she and her aides had Blackberry phones that operated within and beyond SAP and secure areas in text, voice and data. This is about a simple and straightforward a violation of law and sworn obligation as you can get.
If I took a Blackberry into a SAP space and walked down the hall and then turned around to the security team manning the access control at the X10 or X09 controlled door, they would say, hand me that phone and then destroy it under the eyes of the security top officer. After that, I would be in to a full three hours of questions and paperwork to document my violation of those controls.
She intentionally set up a system of these Blackberries to violate DOS security laws.
Grand jury would be in D.C. and 90+% of D.C. are rabid Hillary supporters. This would end up with “no bill” regardless of what evidence is provided.