Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Innovative

That’s not what she said and she’s already refuted that take.

She’ll accept the report, she said about acting on it. She still controls the officials who would vote to recommend an indictment.


29 posted on 07/01/2016 8:50:52 AM PDT by SaxxonWoods (Ride To The Sound Of The Guns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SaxxonWoods

Above should read:

*she said “nothing” about acting on it*


31 posted on 07/01/2016 8:53:07 AM PDT by SaxxonWoods (Ride To The Sound Of The Guns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: SaxxonWoods

Of course she’ll accept the report. Regardless of anything, they always accept the report. That’s just normal.

Her statement was 100% BS.


55 posted on 07/01/2016 9:36:53 AM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: SaxxonWoods

In other words, she’ll gladly accept the report and review it. But that does not mean she will agree to pursue a indictment against Hillary.

Obama would be the first witness. That spells Constitutional crisis.


56 posted on 07/01/2016 9:43:38 AM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: SaxxonWoods

And Obama would be the first witness because H. Clinton had sent him email from her private server.

Constitutional crisis.


57 posted on 07/01/2016 9:50:06 AM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson