Indicting isn’t convicting. There is every legal and evidentiary reason to indict and everyone knows this.
You are technically still presumed innocent while under indictment.... So any one of us would be indicted with this much public evidence.
However, it kills her chances of being the nominee. AND THIS IS THE ONLY FACT THESE CORRUPT OFFICIALS ARE MAKING THEIR DECISION ON.
The fact that she is running for President should not be the top fact they use to make a decision whether to indict. Another fact that shouldn’t play a part is any threat Lynch may have received.
THE EVIDENCE DEMANDS INDICTMENT. More investigation. That’s the truth.
My points are that the indict or not qestiion rests entirely in the DOJ, and that the FBI is not in the business of telling the DOJ whether or not to indict, although the implied (and actual) bias of the FBI, when it forwards a file to the DOJ, is that the facts support indictment.
-- The fact that she is running for President should not be the top fact they use to make a decision whether to indict. --
Just proves the point that we are a nation of men, not laws.