SECOND: the scope of this decision is LIMITED to the parties of the case. The Constitution does NOT give the judicial branch legislative power to create national law. The constitutional power of the judicial branch is LIMITED TO INDIVIDUAL CASES AND CONTROVERSIES (Art III, Sec 2).
It practice: it’s going to take something like Texas seceding to enforce such a notion. We have an Achilles heel in the constitution and it’s called the Supreme Court. It’s been known about for, what, only 200+ years. The people have shown that it can be manipulated like Silly Putty and they will still Bow Down to that Play Doh play.
The pro-life movement should have been demanding nullification since January 22, 1973.
The words “women’s health” have translated to “kill the baby” for a long time now.
Do we have comparable examples of state law governing dentists, eye doctors, general medical clinics, same-day surgery centers, and the like?
For:
1. The doctor/facility must have admitting privs to a nearby hospital.
2. The facility must meet ambulatory surgical center standards.
Isn’t this actually a “good” decision, as it deregulates the entire industry of medical care facilities and surgery centers not in hospitals?
YAAAYYYY!!! Media is thrilled women will continue to get their abortions in filthy “clinics!” YAAAAAYYYY!!!
Fascist ‘Rats want to ban “assault weapons” thus infringing on 2A rights. SCOTUS: “fine with us.”
“Principled Conservatives”: Vote for Hillary!
YAAAAAAAAYYYYY!!!!