Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

It strikes me that the name “socialist” for the leftist method of government is exactly opposite of what the word implies. Inasmuch as societies consist of people who agree to live by certain rules in order to create harmony, Socialism destroys societies. Where the socialist ideal is “What do I get out of it? How much can I soak other people for?”, the capitalist ideal is, “Let’s try to get everyone to be self-sufficient so that no one is a burden on other people; let everyone interact as equals.”

The selfishness of socialism destroys societies. We’ve seen this happen over and over—Venezuela is just the latest in a long line of socialist failures.


8 posted on 06/25/2016 4:41:09 AM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: exDemMom

Antisocial is MUCH more descriptive.


10 posted on 06/25/2016 4:56:00 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: exDemMom
It strikes me that the name “socialist” for the leftist method of government is exactly opposite of what the word implies.

I love quoting myself:

The primary beneficiaries of a socialist program are the socialist politicians. The secondary are the bureaucracies, and tertiaries are the supposed recipients. Everything after is fluff.

15 posted on 06/25/2016 5:28:03 AM PDT by VRW Conspirator (American Jobs for American Workers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson