Very clever. But of course no MSM story writer would ever ask this question!!!!
1 posted on
06/24/2016 11:45:01 AM PDT by
BAW
To: BAW
Mr. Democrat Congressman, can you please tell me which other constitutional rights the government can suspend without the benefit of a day in court?They will all just say SCOTUS made up that right in recent years.
2 posted on
06/24/2016 11:48:43 AM PDT by
dirtboy
To: BAW
This would deny the right to bear arms to up to a million people because someone in a government office in Washington put their name on a list."He shall not live; look, with a spot I damn him." - Julius Caesar, Act IV, scene 1
3 posted on
06/24/2016 11:49:48 AM PDT by
chajin
("There is no other name under heaven given among people by which we must be saved." Acts 4:12)
To: BAW
Nope. "How many of you own guns?" "Oh, 26 of you. Interesting." 😯
4 posted on
06/24/2016 11:52:06 AM PDT by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
To: BAW
The system worked....
FBI interviewed that guy 3 times... no problem identified.
A gun shop owner reported him 4 weeks before the incident after his attempt to buy body armor... no response from feds...
He made terrorist related threats over the phone (recorded)... no response
He shoots and kills 50+ people... Dems try to push more gun control.
Yeah!... makes a LOT of sense to me!
The blood of GAYS is on DEMOCRAT hands!!!
5 posted on
06/24/2016 11:52:47 AM PDT by
Safrguns
To: BAW
I know that this is off-topic, but as long as we are talking about questions not asked. Wouldn't you think someone would ask Hillary Clinton: "If you were to become president, would actions would you take if one of the members of your cabinet handled sensitive information like you handled it as Secretary of State?". or "What would you do to a member of your cabinet who played as fast and lose with the laws and rules as you have?"
6 posted on
06/24/2016 11:53:32 AM PDT by
fhayek
To: BAW
Mr. Democrat Congressman, can you please tell me which other constitutional rights the government can suspend without the benefit of a day in court?
By their reckoning, all of them.
7 posted on
06/24/2016 11:57:13 AM PDT by
Bratch
To: BAW
How can a law repeal any part of a constitutional amendment?
Again, msm would never ask.
8 posted on
06/24/2016 11:59:48 AM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: BAW
I want to ask:
"Mr. Democrat Congressman, are you willing to give up all your armed protection, including the guards at the entrance to this building."
9 posted on
06/24/2016 12:04:27 PM PDT by
BitWielder1
(I'd rather have Unequal Wealth than Equal Poverty.)
To: BAW
Well, according to Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.), when talking to the
MSM on Morning Joe, "The problem we have, and really the firewall we have right now is due process. It's all due process."
10 posted on
06/24/2016 12:07:26 PM PDT by
Sopater
(Is it not lawful for me to do what I will with mine own? - Matthew 20:15a)
To: BAW
“Mr. Democrat Congressman, can you please tell me which other constitutional rights the government can suspend without the benefit of a day in court?”
Technically, lots of them. There are people locked in jail who haven’t gone to court yet.
11 posted on
06/24/2016 12:09:02 PM PDT by
AppyPappy
(If you really want to irritate someone, point out something obvious they are trying hard to ignore.)
To: BAW
One question is: with what hand do you wipe your ass?
12 posted on
06/24/2016 12:12:15 PM PDT by
HomerBohn
(Liberals and Slinkys: Good for nothing but make you smile as you shove them down the stairs.)
To: BAW
I just called my congresscritter’s office. He was an early member of the sit in. I actually had a smidgen of respect for him prior to this. His minion was pretty speechless when I asked the question prefaced by my name and address for a written response.
He was also listed on another website as a Democrat member of Congress who was known to be a gun owner. What a hypocrite.
13 posted on
06/24/2016 12:22:41 PM PDT by
cyclotic
To: BAW
I just called my congresscritter’s office. He was an early member of the sit in. I actually had a smidgen of respect for him prior to this. His minion was pretty speechless when I asked the question prefaced by my name and address for a written response.
He was also listed on another website as a Democrat member of Congress who was known to be a gun owner. What a hypocrite.
14 posted on
06/24/2016 12:22:41 PM PDT by
cyclotic
To: BAW
You have to give the left credit for one thing: They are very good at manipulating the language used to frame the debate. Too many people now see gun control for what it really is: it’s all about control, not guns. Recognizing that this wording is no longer working for them, the left is now using the term Gun Safety in place of Gun Control. (After all, who could be opposed to “safety?”) We let them get away with this tactic all of the time, with terms like “undocumented immigrant” instead of “illegal alien”, and “pro-choice” instead of “anti-life.” As Rush Limbaugh has said many times over the years, “words mean things.” We have to stop falling for this trick, and define the issues in our own language.
To: BAW
17 posted on
06/24/2016 1:30:54 PM PDT by
Sergio
(An object at rest cannot be stopped! - The Evil Midnight Bomber What Bombs at Midnight)
To: BAW
true, but hey, this wasn’t about truth. it was a photo op temper tantrum.
19 posted on
06/25/2016 6:37:35 AM PDT by
SoFloFreeper
((Just say no to HRC))
To: BAW
The one question reporters PURPOSELY failed to ask any of the Democrats about their sit-in protest
20 posted on
06/25/2016 7:38:10 AM PDT by
TigersEye
(This is the age of the death of reason and rule of law. Prepare!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson