Skip to comments.
CNN’s Clinton Cash ‘Fact-Check’ Ends in Embarrassment for Cristina Alesci and Laurie Frankel
Breitbart ^
| June 23,2016
Posted on 06/23/2016 11:19:15 AM PDT by Hojczyk
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
1
posted on
06/23/2016 11:19:15 AM PDT
by
Hojczyk
To: Hojczyk
To: Hojczyk
“Echo Chamber” journalism.
3
posted on
06/23/2016 11:22:45 AM PDT
by
blackdog
(There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
To: Hojczyk
"Indeed, as Bloomberg, Washington Post, New Yorker, ABC News, New York Times, and myriad other Establishment media have all confirmed, Clinton Cashs most explosive revelations are accurate. "
4
posted on
06/23/2016 11:26:18 AM PDT
by
VanDeKoik
To: blackdog
5
posted on
06/23/2016 11:26:38 AM PDT
by
epluribus_2
(he had the best mom - ever.)
To: Hojczyk
I would enjoy emphasizing here that New York is a community property sate meaning the Hillary was getting 1/2 of the bribe money and Bill the other. It mattered not what account it was placed it. It is important that she release all of her bank record before she is nominated . The people have a right to know if she was selling State department favors for personal cash. Then of course we get to the alter ego “foundation” but focus on her personal direct deposits first.
6
posted on
06/23/2016 11:27:20 AM PDT
by
WENDLE
(CRUSH THESE TRUMP TRAITORS)
To: WENDLE
7
posted on
06/23/2016 11:30:02 AM PDT
by
timestax
(American Media = Domestic Enemy)
To: timestax
8
posted on
06/23/2016 11:31:11 AM PDT
by
timestax
(American Media = Domestic Enemy)
To: timestax
9
posted on
06/23/2016 11:32:31 AM PDT
by
timestax
(American Media = Domestic Enemy)
To: Hojczyk
Mr. Trump set this in motion yesterday. More is coming. Enjoy.
10
posted on
06/23/2016 11:35:37 AM PDT
by
bankwalker
(Does a fish know that it's wet?)
To: Buckeye McFrog
Gergen should be ashamed of himself for associating his name with a defense of that woman, Ms. Clinton. (As Bill would say)
11
posted on
06/23/2016 11:41:39 AM PDT
by
wildbill
(If you check behind the shower curtain for a slasher, and find one.... what's your plan?)
To: blackdog
Fact-checking the fact checkers.
People who live in stone houses should not throw glass. The shards end up cutting their own fingers.
12
posted on
06/23/2016 11:42:12 AM PDT
by
alloysteel
(Of course you will live in interesting times, Nobody has a choice, now.)
To: Hojczyk
.
As we already knew, one cannot debunk that which contains no bunk.
13
posted on
06/23/2016 11:43:55 AM PDT
by
editor-surveyor
(Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
To: Hojczyk
“Why was Bill Clinton taking any money from a bank linked to the Kremlin while his wife was Secretary of State?”
Because they are the Clinton’s dammit.
14
posted on
06/23/2016 11:44:20 AM PDT
by
McGruff
(How about investigating the donations to the Clinton Foundation)
To: WENDLE
The following are community property states:
Louisiana, Arizona, California, Texas, Washington, Idaho, Nevada, New Mexico, and Wisconsin. Alaska couples can opt into a community property arrangement if they so desire.
New York is not a community property state in the strictest sense of the word. (Community property is a legal concept borrowed from Mexico, and with some exceptions, is more prevalent in the area of the U.S. which was formerly subject to Mexican sovereignty.) Rather, New York is more properly characterized as an "equitable distribution" state, i.e., one in which property acquired during the marriage is subject to "equitable" or "fair" (but not necessarily equal) distribution upon the dissolution of the marriage.
So, the proceeds of the Clinton influence peddling/money-laundering operation may be subject to "equitable" division upon the dissolution of their marriage, but for those statutes to be applicable, the Clintons would have to be heading to divorce court.
And if that hasn't happened by now, it's probably not going to happen at all.
15
posted on
06/23/2016 11:46:45 AM PDT
by
Milton Miteybad
(I am Jim Thompson. {Really.})
To: Hojczyk
So far, I haven’t heard any real defense being put up by the Clinton campaign. I did hear her say in a speech yesterday, that Trump was attacking her personally because he doesn’t have any answers to her on substance, she then stated that the Clinton Foundation was for charitable work. Essentially, the response she came up with was, “I am not a crook”, or at least that is what it sounded like to me. You would think that with 800 staffers they could come up with something substantive, but so far, I haven’t heard anything. It’s because she really has no defense other than to try to distract people from the truthfulness of what Trump accused her of.
16
posted on
06/23/2016 11:49:26 AM PDT
by
euram
To: alloysteel
Not sure when Fact Checkers started but it wasn’t that long ago. It has never been anything but spin and media propaganda. We need to debunk the entire notion of “FACT CHECKING”.
17
posted on
06/23/2016 11:55:11 AM PDT
by
DrDude
(Does anyone have a set of balls anymore?)
To: Hojczyk
Hillary was asked if Bill would cut ties with the foundation if she was elected.
Her response? We will cross that bridge when we get to it, i.e., NO.
h/t intellectual froglegs
18
posted on
06/23/2016 12:13:05 PM PDT
by
joshua c
(Allah's paradise is full of mass murderers)
To: Hojczyk
Apparently, CNNs Cristina Alesci and Laurie Frankel are among the last to know. Oh, they knew it. But, their assignment was to write an article that omitted it, with the expectation that most readers of the article would NOT know it.
An ethical journalist would refuse to write such an article. But, Alesci and Frankel are either ethical or journalists. They are nothing more than willing partisan shills for Hillary.
To: Hojczyk
Trump will continue to blast away with this stuff. The dinosaur media will try to suppress/dismiss it. Trump will bypass them and go directly to the American people - like another American political leader whose hair was the subject of much discussion!
20
posted on
06/23/2016 12:53:50 PM PDT
by
karnage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson