Some guy on FNC this am was saying that Comey ( “if he believes in Democracy and our two-party system”) will indict Hillary before she is nomnated so that the RATs can replace her. Personally, I want her to at least get the nomination before any indictment (if it comes at all) is made. And I personally hope she stays in with or without the indictment because so long as the facts are out about what she did, we’re better off as her as the RAT candidate.
I'm seeing this idea more and more and you could be correct. Personally I think it will all hinge on what Obama feels will be best for Obama. He hold all the cards and it doesn't appear to me that he has played them all.
There are only four options:
Indict before the convention.
Indict after the nomination.
Report out from Justice that there is insufficient evidence to charge her.
Don't allow the investigation to close and just do nothing.
Game on. Place your bets.
“Report out from Justice that there is insufficient evidence to charge her.
Don’t allow the investigation to close and just do nothing.”
I vote for Door #3 or #4. But either of these “options” will , of necessity, “smoke out” Comey. On #3 he will have to speak up or we will know he’s in the tank, and actually for #4 it’s almost the same since he wil have to “agree” that he’s “not done” when we will know that that’s a lie!
One thing I have not seen much talk about was how HRC’s server set-up effectively blinded the POTUS to dealings at the state dept. He was dependent on her to provide info, and she could withhold anything she wanted. He was her boss, she worked for him, and he relied on her to execute his policies... but by keeping info outside of the hands of government archives she held the strings over him. It was a power play, but one which is intolerable in a Republic.
I’ve bet all along Clinton would NOT be the nominee. Not that that’s what I want!