On the other hand, on the same blog, by the same author, comes the article “Trump to Obama: ‘It’s not guns. It’s terrorism’”.
Since the two articles are diametrically opposed, I have to assume that Trump goes before the NRA to really understand the issue, and that this sentiment is expressed before that understanding is had.
Wouldn't it be nice, though, to have a candidate who didn't need a sit-down with the NRA to find out what his position on the 2nd A. should be?