Posted on 06/17/2016 7:39:32 AM PDT by DrJeff
That appears to be the heart of the case and the exact case the plaintiff is prepared to make.
For years, [the companies] have knowingly permitted the terrorist group ISIS to use their social networks as a tool for spreading extremist propaganda, raising funds and attracting new recruits.
In view of this trio’s current pro-islam and anti-homosexual censorship I think this guys got good chance of winning his case. I hope he breaks them.
Right, but “knowingly” is the key there. If a website does it “unknowingly”, then you might have a case for negligence, but you’d get a far smaller judgement for negligence than intentional malfeasance.
Hope he makes them hemorrhage money.
Everything jihadists say and on the internet is “hate speech.”
The big techies are aiding and abetting terrorism.
Look for it to get worse when the UN takes over the internet.
For years, [the companies] have knowingly permitted the terrorist group ISIS to use their social networks as a tool for spreading extremist propaganda, raising funds and attracting new recruits.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.