Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nickcarraway

The Table should not include elements with existences measured in milliseconds.


2 posted on 06/09/2016 9:33:12 PM PDT by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: arthurus

“The Table should not include elements with existences measured in milliseconds.”

Why not?


14 posted on 06/09/2016 10:08:14 PM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: arthurus

Actually, some theorize that there are stable, super-heavy elements waiting to be created.

I’m waiting for 420 Doobium


20 posted on 06/09/2016 11:17:30 PM PDT by VanShuyten ("a shadow...draped nobly in the folds of a gorgeous eloquence.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: arthurus
The Table should not include elements with existences measured in milliseconds.

In particle physics, a millisecond is an eternity. If you're talking about planck time, you'd have a better argument. That said, even though these elements exist for very short periods of time, you can learn how they behave and interact and it helps verify the physics models.

Even further beyond that is that once it is known how these elements will behave, new interactions with other elements may become possible that creates something very desirable.

To reject the existence of these things because they only exist in an accelerator or only existed in the first few femtoseconds of the universe is silly and shortsighted.

29 posted on 06/10/2016 7:18:28 AM PDT by Malsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson