They're giving Couric every opportunity to back down, the defamation lawsuit and discovery that will now follow is going to soak her and that producer/editor with legal fees.
He will not be “intimidated” into being honest.
The Ministry of Propaganda got caught red-handed.
Propaganda is what they do.
When in doubt lie - and lie again.
Katie Couric was one of the extreme regulars on the jets flying out to Epstein’s rape Island.
the gun issue was bad enough but why is absolutely no one asking her about this?
Katie Couric at this point should not even be working.
Of course not. Clinton supporters love Nazi propaganda. Being a Nazi means never having to say you’re sorry. However, to celebrate the release of this propaganda, I bought my fourth new firearm since Obama came into power. LOL! He and Clinton are the best firearms salespeople ever! They take the time to teach us what the Second Amendment is all about and it’s not hunting or the National Guard.
Goebbels was unapologetic, too.
Hillary needs to take note of this and offer this person a job ASAP. Best SPIN I’ve seen in a while.
“Couric’s Director Unapologetic Over Selectively Editing Interview With Gun Owners”
No surprise. In one interview when she questioned about the clam that even lots of NRA members oppose many of the NRA’s positions like no universal background checks, she was asked why they were members of the NRA, in that case? She said because of the “good deals” they get from various NRA vendor discounts, which of course is a real howler.
I’ve checked out several of these “good deals” at one time or the other, and pretty much they’re the very opposite of good deals. For instance, they couldn’t come close to the rates I get from my local State Farm agent on any kind of insurance, and I had to spend A LOT of time giving A LOT of details to get the quotes.
Not surprised. Obama set the tone; this is the Age of Doubling-Down when you get caught lying, stealing, or violating rights.
They're giving Couric every opportunity to back down, the defamation lawsuit and discovery that will now follow is going to soak her and that producer/editor with legal fees.
It sounds more like a `false light’ claim.
The Elements of False Light
“In a false light claim, the plaintiff must prove the following elements:
The defendant published some information about the plaintiff.
The information must portray the plaintiff in a false or misleading light.
The information is highly offensive or embarrassing to a reasonable person of ordinary sensibilities.
The defendant must have published the information with reckless disregard as to its offensiveness.
“A false light claim is usually easier to bring than a defamation claim. Take, for example, a newspaper article about the issue of child molestation in certain churches. If the editor includes a photograph of an innocent priest who has not been accused of or otherwise associated with child molestation, the newspaper may be liable for false light - the inclusion of the photograph implies that the priest is involved in child molestation - but not for defamation, as there was no false statement made. In a defamation action, the newspaper-defendant would simply assert that no statement was actually made about the photographed priest and child molestation.”
The pathology of the left is not that different from serial killers. They never apologize either.
It is just part of their disease.