Curious that the “eyewitness account” you support is not supported by the autopsies. I predict it will take years for the gummint to release the information correlating the ballistics with the autopsies which will be a whole ‘nuther level of facts failing to support the police story.
I won’t claim to be an “expert” who would testify under oath as such but I would say ten years of training in Neurosurgery gave me experience in firearm caused wounds of the head and neck in such places as St. Louis, Camden, New Jersey, Philly, and Chicago that when I read the autopsy reports on these victims I see only one wound that is NOT .223. The abdominal wound that failed to fully penetrate the abdominal wall and was certainly not a lethal injury. As I state, it will take years for the truth to come out but I am comfortable basing my assertions on my personal experience and am certain my assertions will be much closer to reality than yours.
NONE of the other wounds are consistent with handgun injuries. If you feel compelled to insist otherwise see if you can find a real expert who would agree with you. My bet is you won’t.
” I read the autopsy reports on these victims I see only one wound that is NOT .223. “
If you knew what you were talking about, you would know that the the bullet info was obtained from the bullets recovered, not the wounds ...
“I won’t claim to be an “expert” “
Interesting. Last post you were a mathematician ...
“Curious that the “eyewitness account” you support is not supported by the autopsies.”
Interesting that Richie’s autopsy matches the account to a tee ...