[Mr Ramsbotham]

She single handedly derailed pro-life legislation in Congress.

Are we back to caring about that? It gets confusing.

[bootless]

>>Are we back to caring about that? It gets confusing. <<

I hope we never stopped caring about that. It’s also in Jim’s mission statement for FR, which is listed on the front page:

Statement by the founder of Free Republic

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1103363/posts

“As a conservative site, Free Republic is pro-God, pro-life, pro-family, pro-Constitution, pro-Bill of Rights, pro-gun, pro-limited government, pro-private property rights, pro-limited taxes, pro-capitalism, pro-national defense, pro-freedom, and-pro America. We oppose all forms of liberalism, socialism, fascism, pacifism, totalitarianism, anarchism, government enforced atheism, abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, racism, wacko environmentalism, judicial activism, etc.”

You may not care. But you don’t speak for the whole of the site.

[bootless]

Adding:

I think I may have misread your post as a serious statement against the pro-life stance. I apologize.

In general, I have seen posters seriously reject a pro-life stance here (and recently), which is why I misread your post. I’m sorry about that... I hope anyone who thinks that we don’t need to pay attention to that reconsiders, and quickly.

Thanks.