Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The smug style in American liberalism (by suspended Vox writer Emmitt Rensin)
Vox ^ | 4/21/16 | Emmitt Rensin

Posted on 06/03/2016 12:05:44 PM PDT by Faith Presses On

There is a smug style in American liberalism. It has been growing these past decades. It is a way of conducting politics, predicated on the belief that American life is not divided by moral difference or policy divergence — not really — but by the failure of half the country to know what's good for them.

In 2016, the smug style has found expression in media and in policy, in the attitudes of liberals both visible and private, providing a foundational set of assumptions above which a great number of liberals comport their understanding of the world.

It has led an American ideology hitherto responsible for a great share of the good accomplished over the past century of our political life to a posture of reaction and disrespect: a condescending, defensive sneer toward any person or movement outside of its consensus, dressed up as a monopoly on reason.

The smug style is a psychological reaction to a profound shift in American political demography.

(Excerpt) Read more at vox.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: marktwain

And note that he’s the Vox writer that was just suspended for calling for riots at Trump’s rallies. It’s quite curious.


21 posted on 06/03/2016 1:03:46 PM PDT by Faith Presses On (Above all, politics should serve the Great Commission, "preparing the way for the Lord.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Faith Presses On

“It is a way of conducting politics, predicated on the belief that American life is not divided by moral difference or policy divergence — not really — but by the failure of half the country to know what’s good for them.”

One of the more smug statements you’ll ever read.


22 posted on 06/03/2016 1:11:26 PM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Faith Presses On

“And note that he’s the Vox writer that was just suspended for calling for riots at Trump’s rallies. It’s quite curious.”

It is actually consistent. If he believes that smug will not stop Trump, and that Trump will win, other tactics are called for. He is calling for other tactics.

Or, he could be a closet conservative, or about to become one.

The “smug” essay fairly drips with contempt for those practising the smugness. The readers on the left are not capable of understanding it, because to admit its accuracy tears their whole understanding of the universe to shreds.

Emmet is bright, and a talented writer. I could see him becoming the next David Horowitz. I could see him becoming a Trump supporter.


23 posted on 06/03/2016 1:17:07 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Emmet should be Emmitt


24 posted on 06/03/2016 1:18:17 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Faith Presses On
The writer is as smart as a whip, a real rhetorical craftsman, and philosophically honest. Okay, he's got a violent imagination, but many of us have been there and mended our ways.

He'll be a conservative approximately next week.

25 posted on 06/03/2016 1:21:02 PM PDT by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamuraiScot; marktwain

And perhaps a Christian:

“It was an odd thing to assert in the case of Christianity, a religion that until recently was taken to be another shibboleth of the uncool, not a loving faith misunderstood by bigots. But this is knowing: knowing that the new line on Jesus is that the homophobes just don’t get their own faith.”


26 posted on 06/03/2016 1:31:15 PM PDT by Faith Presses On (Above all, politics should serve the Great Commission, "preparing the way for the Lord.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Faith Presses On

Bkmk


27 posted on 06/03/2016 1:36:06 PM PDT by Natufian (t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Faith Presses On

Just from reading those lead-in paragraphs, it appears he is 20+ years late in identifying the smug that Thomas Sowell well-documented in his excellent book,

The Vision of the Anointed: Self-Congratulation as a Basis for Social Policy
http://www.amazon.com/Vision-Anointed-Self-Congratulation-Social-Policy/dp/046508995X
Sowell presents a devastating critique of the mind-set behind the failed social policies of the past thirty years. Sowell sees what has happened during that time not as a series of isolated mistakes but as a logical consequence of a tainted vision whose defects have led to crises in education, crime, and family dynamics, and to other social pathologies. In this book, he describes how elites—the anointed—have replaced facts and rational thinking with rhetorical assertions, thereby altering the course of our social policy.

Highly recommended reading.

This guy goes on to blame the Left’s abandonment of the working middle class for the smug, but the smug predated this, and caused it over time.


28 posted on 06/03/2016 1:38:40 PM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Faith Presses On

And just as a reminder, Vox is run by Ezra Klein of the "Journolist" scandal.

http://dailycaller.com/2010/07/25/the-fix-was-in-journolist-e-mails-reveal-how-the-liberal-media-shaped-the-2008-election/

29 posted on 06/03/2016 2:15:46 PM PDT by Faith Presses On (Above all, politics should serve the Great Commission, "preparing the way for the Lord.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Faith Presses On
And perhaps a Christian:

Good point!

30 posted on 06/03/2016 2:18:28 PM PDT by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6

You’re not getting, are you? “Predicated on the belief” — did you catch that part? Do you understand he is criticizing, not endorsing? No, I guess you do not.


31 posted on 06/03/2016 2:30:38 PM PDT by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Faith Presses On

The liberal ideal is win by smug and feigned moral superiority. The communist ideal is to win by violence. This pajama boy fancies himself a communist, it appears.


32 posted on 06/03/2016 2:39:55 PM PDT by Chaguito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Faith Presses On

“...a hateful bigot who did not even understand her own religion”

To write that, the author is stating that he - he - knows what her religion states/believes more than SHE does...

That assertion - right there - can only come from the mind of a smug, fascistic, liberal. Amazing. And smug.


33 posted on 06/03/2016 2:44:28 PM PDT by Noamie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Faith Presses On

And when the time comes, he and his cohorts would gladly load you in the boxcar.


34 posted on 06/03/2016 2:50:55 PM PDT by Kommodor (Terrorist, Journalist or Democrat? I can't tell the difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Faith Presses On
It is very difficult for me to reconcile the author who recommended physical violence the other day (and was suspended from his position for it) with the author of this remarkably introspective piece. My advice for the young feller is stay the hell off Twitter, it only makes him look stupid.

"Smug" is to politics what "settled science" is to the climate debates: an attempt not to participate in serious debate on the issue, but to avoid it. It is necessarily superficial therefore, proudly so, and adhered to with an odd combination of emotional passion and intellectual laziness. It is, for example, how policies intended to help the poor become favored over policies that actually do, and where the "our intentions were sound" excuse derives when they fail.

The author's treatment leans more toward tribal insularity, which may in fact be the case, for his observation that what once was a liberal inclusion of working-class opinion is now an open disdain of it, is perfectly accurate. A refusal to communicate, if I understand his argument correctly, has become a refusal to learn. And it is perfectly true that not one single liberal acquaintance of mine has any conception of what it takes to grow the food he is eating, even in this semi-rural place I live. That wasn't the case until the great bifurcation - his term - of the 70's. It is now.

This political estrangement threatens to end in divorce, and such things can be messy - bloody - indeed, which is why I cannot understand how an individual this intellectually capable could have gotten sucked into the ridiculous "bash their heads - no, I don't mean their heads, but burn their property" tribal chant that managed to earn him the heave-ho. Perhaps consistency is too much to ask for from a 26-year-old, but it is highly disappointing to say the very least.

35 posted on 06/03/2016 3:10:00 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: econjack

A corollary to what you say is that when the system rewards productive work, almost everybody wants to participate.


36 posted on 06/03/2016 3:11:50 PM PDT by ichabod1 (Make America Normal Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

bttt


37 posted on 06/03/2016 3:14:08 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a Simple Manner for a Happy Life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Noamie
Yes, but he is actually criticizing the left for having that attitude. He is saying that is how the left viewed Kim Davis, and how the left views evangelical Christians, which is true. He did call for riots at Trump appearances, but he can't very accepted on the left, either. He's 26, so we'll see what he ends up believing in the future.
38 posted on 06/03/2016 3:15:45 PM PDT by Faith Presses On (Above all, politics should serve the Great Commission, "preparing the way for the Lord.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

I know, right? Whole article can be summed up in one word: Crimethink.


39 posted on 06/03/2016 3:18:00 PM PDT by ichabod1 (Make America Normal Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Romulus
Misread the quote....and thanks so much for your condescension.
40 posted on 06/03/2016 3:20:44 PM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson