Wednesday, June 01, 2016 Judicial Watch Director of Research and Investigations Chris Farrell appeared on”America’s Newsroom” on Fox News Channel to discuss the latest developments in the depositions of Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s inner circle regarding her use of private email while serving at the State Department.
Clinton aide blames email bungle on Benghazi, illness
Jun. 01, 2016 - 4:35 - Judicial Watch blasts ‘insulting’ excuses in Cheryl Mills’ deposition testimony
Probably going to court to compel Mills to answer questions.
It’s what mob lawyers do.
Damn, it feels good to be a gangster.
The Clinton’s have it down to a formula. Deny, deny, deny. Pardon, pardon, pardon.
It might be easier and faster to relate those questions she did answer :)
How many standing ovations did the media give her?
Pray America wakes
All part of the plan...the other Clintonistas sharing the same law team will have similar memory issues...
Alex, I’ll take truth for one thousand!
Ok. .which newspaper reported on Mills testimony first?
Ah, um, err. Who is -——— blatt
Sorry, the correct answer is. ——— NONE!
Like her boss her mind in jello.
Gosh, what a shock.
I predicted this tacctic months ago because it is a tried and proven way for the Clinton gang to avoid taking the 5th.
You can trace it’s origins back to Hillary’s testimony at various inquireies in the 90s where she swore under oath that “she had no specific recollection’ or “I don’t recall” over 200 times.
Remember Holder’s use of it more recently?
It’s what they do to avoid telling the truth while avoiding the notice that taking the 5th would entail.
Thanks for posting and kudos to Breitbart for curating this.
I haven’t read the entire thing, but several things jump out at me. Here’s one:
Mills actually doesn’t use “I don’t know” as a stand alone all that often. What she usually does is pad the assertion with ridiculous qualifying phrases, front and back. Escape hatches. The ones that interest me most are the ones where she says, in answer to a direct question, some variation of, “I don’t know that I can add to what I’ve already said earlier on that.” That’s not an “I don’t know.” It’s a tell. She’s not sure of how she answered before. So she’s refusing to answer. Those are the points, I think, where she feels particular risk of personal exposure.
Bump for posterity plus:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3445687/posts
Mills learned well from her master re Whitewater “I don’t recall” by Mrs Bill Clinton