I'm afraid of the following scenario:
Comey has so much data, so much evidence with multiple felonies that he recommends indictment to Loretta Lynch. She checks with Obama and Jarrett and they say, "Okay, go ahead with a Grand Jury."
The D.C. Grand Jury, all dems, all minorities, after 'exhaustive' review of Comey's overwhelming evidence with 100+ years of indictable offenses, find a "No Bill" on the case.
"A no-bill means that the Grand Jury decided that was not sufficient evidence to send your case to District Court for prosecution. While a Grand Jury can turn around and change its mind and issue an indictment, up until the time that the statute of limitations time period runs for that offense, that is extremely rare."
So, there you have it, they jump through the hoops, have plausible denial, and she walks.
But, can you go the Special Prosecutor route rather than a Grand Jury? When do they do Special Prosecutor vs. Grand Jury? Can Comey request a Special Prosecutor? . . recommend one with his announcement?
The email/server scandal, espionage case is one huge area. Her Blackmailability, etc. . lots of possibilities there.
The Clinton Foundation/Clinton Global Initiative international money laundering octopus is a whole other huge area.
It really is a joke and a travesty of our justice system that this person is actually running for President and just might really be the democratic nominee for President. She should be tried for espionage and treason at a bare minimum. Will we ever know the true extent of her voluminous crimes?
No, the travesty is that so many millions of people in this country (like some of my in laws) openly admit they know she is a criminal and they want her to be President.
And that, my FRiends is why this country is in the crapper and circling the bowl. Not Hillary, but your next door neighbor who actually wants a traitor in the WH. Getting her out of the picture changes none of the underlying moral corruption which is endemic in this country.