Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

For First Time in Modern Era, Living With Parents Edges Out Other Living Arrangements for 18-34y.o.
Pew ^

Posted on 05/31/2016 1:19:52 PM PDT by TigerClaws

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

1 posted on 05/31/2016 1:19:52 PM PDT by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Incomplete without a picture of pajama boy.


2 posted on 05/31/2016 1:22:35 PM PDT by MSF BU (Support the troops: Join Them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Government’s insatiable demand for the output of others force both parents in two-parent households to work full time. That same demand - along with regulation causing huge increases in the price of everything from food to clothing to appliances to vehicles - has impoverished kids suckered into attending universities.


3 posted on 05/31/2016 1:22:50 PM PDT by relictele (Principiis obsta & Finem respice - Resist The Beginnings & Consider The Ends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Exactly the way the RATS want it.Renters vote for RATS,owners vote GOP.


4 posted on 05/31/2016 1:24:07 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Obamanomics:Trickle Up Poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

So what happens to the moronials when the older working generation retires?


5 posted on 05/31/2016 1:24:34 PM PDT by dsrtsage (One half of all people have below average IQ. In the US the number is 54%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

There are so many bad things about our “modern” society that led to this. Some are economic — young people simply can’t afford houses anymore in some parts of the country. Some are social — liberal propaganda has completely destroyed the social construct that young people get married and have kids in their 20s, or ever. Liberal society wants young people to be wards of the state, not property-owning, married couples.


6 posted on 05/31/2016 1:24:40 PM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

I would rather have my kids living with us after college while working and trying to save up for a house, and keep the money in the family, than to give money to another family in the form of rent.


7 posted on 05/31/2016 1:24:52 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Opinionated Blowhard

This is trouble for one version of the “American dream” but could that, in fact, have been a kind of slow American nightmare?

The last verse of the Old Testament talks about turning the hearts of the fathers to the sons and vice versa “lest [God] should strike the land with a curse.”

Not every extended household is a Pajama Boy household.


8 posted on 05/31/2016 1:30:04 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
That's not what this article is about. But whilst we're there, how do you figure that?

I know of a lot of renters who have voted GOP and many owners who vote Dem. It really depends upon where one lives.

OTOH, this infantilization, of what was once considered to be an ADULT, is what the Dems want.

9 posted on 05/31/2016 1:31:28 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

Many cultures have extended families without being “infantile” about the youngest adults.

I try to look what God has wrought, not necessarily man.


10 posted on 05/31/2016 1:33:03 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MSF BU

My nephew still lives with my sister, but he’s no pajama boy.

Just stupid. ( not that the pajama boys aren’t)


11 posted on 05/31/2016 1:33:10 PM PDT by VanShuyten ("a shadow...draped nobly in the folds of a gorgeous eloquence.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dsrtsage

Good question. From what I’m seeing with thier parents, they will not retire at the normal age. They will be working much longer. These kids learned poor financial habits somewhere!


12 posted on 05/31/2016 1:33:41 PM PDT by goodwithagun (March 3, 2016: The date FReepers justified the "goodness" of Planned Parenthood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dsrtsage

Fake their way onto disability?Cash out their inheritance?


13 posted on 05/31/2016 1:34:09 PM PDT by Farmer Dean (Never be more than two steps away from your weapon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Someone has to change their full diapers.


14 posted on 05/31/2016 1:34:12 PM PDT by Old Yeller (Calling Obama a POS is a major insult to S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goodwithagun

Could this pressure encourage the creation of family enterprises once again? With the successes of modern medicine, elders are living to more and more viable years.


15 posted on 05/31/2016 1:35:05 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

They are trying to spin this as a result of preferred cultural changes as opposed to the real reason, an economy that doesn’t work for young people.

Especially young males.

Of course the irresponsible are going to have kids on our dime anyway which makes the problem worse.


16 posted on 05/31/2016 1:35:31 PM PDT by crusher2013 (Liberalism is Aristocracy masquerading as equality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

True, to some extent; however, the American Millennial generation is THE most infantile adults, who have ever lived!


17 posted on 05/31/2016 1:35:48 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Exactly correct.
A decent, kind, and hard-working kid living at home while he or she saves a few dimes is not such a horror.
Having a child living elsewhere, with a pile of roommates, and sending money to someone else isn't so attractive.


18 posted on 05/31/2016 1:36:10 PM PDT by Blue Jays
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

It makes perfect sense to me. I’m glad my kids live here. They will leave soon enough. They have rooms and can save money. Apartments are insanely expensive. Jobs are few and far between. My brother lived at home til he was probably 25, then he bought a house. There should be no rush toward living far from the family who loves you. Family is important.


19 posted on 05/31/2016 1:36:51 PM PDT by Yaelle (Tinkerbelle glittering up the runway for Trump Force One!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

And with two-earners having to work full-time, who better to take care of the kids than the kids’ grandparents. It’s not like houses aren’t big enough to accommodate them.


20 posted on 05/31/2016 1:37:06 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson