I am pleased the Aussies have recognized the true threat that exists from China. These boats will counter any Chinese visions of dominating the Aussies for many years.
Be it said that modern propulsion boats now being turned out by the Europeans are stealthier than any of the outdated US nuc fleet now in the water. Nucs have great staying power and range, but no longer can match tactically the newest of non-nuc designs, and are better value when the mission is tailored to their strengths.
Are the speeds really that slow?
I would think France’s Sub having the capability for vertical launched cruise missiles might have been factor in selection.
Submarine silencing technology was some of the stuff Bill Clinton traded off to China and I wouldn’t really trust buying high price tagged military equipment from countries undergoing Islamification.
I wonder why there where no U.S bids? Probably because we’re not trusted either.
The chart is wrong in that the French Barracuda also relies on a pump-jet propulsor instead of a conventional screw type propeller. Australia’s comparison of the two subs likely showed that it was the competing German pump-jet propulsor that was not as quiet as the French model. In addition, the French proposal offered a newer sub design than the Germans, with the Barracuda being based on the new French nuclear sub, with further customization pledged to meet Australian needs. Finally, French scientific and technical competence should not be underestimated. When important national objectives are at stake, the French these days tend to get their act together.