On what basis? Read the article and the only one I could identify is to protect Hillary Clinton politically. Didn’t know that was legitimate grounds for a court ruling. Apparently it is now.
Of course, and as much as the libs have already ruled by acclimation, I’m surprised that Madam President isn’t covered by executive privilege.
Someone posted the relevant statute on a previous thread. The order has a legitimate basis and the judge went a step further by allowing a transcript to be released.