Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton’s inexcusable, willful disregard for the rules
WaPo ^ | 05-25-2016 | THE EDITORIAL BOARD

Posted on 05/25/2016 5:15:00 PM PDT by NRx

HILLARY CLINTON’S use of a private email server while secretary of state from 2009 to 2013 has been justifiably criticized as an error of judgment. What the new report from the State Department inspector general makes clear is that it also was not a casual oversight. Ms. Clinton had plenty of warnings to use official government communications methods, so as to make sure that her records were properly preserved and to minimize cybersecurity risks. She ignored them.

The 83-page report declares that “beginning in late 2005 and continuing through 2011,” the department revised its Foreign Affairs Manual and “issued various memoranda specifically discussing the obligation to use Department systems in most circumstances and identifying the risks of not doing so.” Ms. Clinton didn’t.

During her tenure, State Department employees were told that they were expected to use approved, secure methods to transmit information that was sensitive but unclassified, or SBU. If they needed to transmit SBU information outside the department’s network, they were told to ask information specialists for help. The report said there is no evidence that Ms. Clinton ever asked, “despite the fact that emails exchanged on her personal account regularly contained information that was marked as SBU.” On June 28, 2011, a cable was sent to all diplomatic and consular posts over her signature warning that personal email accounts could be compromised and officials should “avoid conducting official Department business from your personal e-mail accounts.” At the time, Ms. Clinton was doing exactly that.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clinton; hillaryclinton; hillarycriminalprobe; hillaryemails; hillaryemailserver; statedeptig
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: NRx

tagline


21 posted on 05/25/2016 6:16:53 PM PDT by null and void ("Progressives replaced doublethink, doublespeak with nothink, nospeak. Orwell wasnÂ’t up to the tas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JOHN ADAMS

Tagline

Corrected I hope...


22 posted on 05/25/2016 6:20:15 PM PDT by null and void (Progressives replaced doublethink, doublespeak with nothink, nospeak. Orwell wasn't up to the task)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NRx

She still hasn’t properly answered why she set up a private server. She has said that it was for her convenience but that in hindsight it was a bad choice, a mistake. I think it was to limit FOIA requests because they might expose how she used her position to extort money for access to her and what she did for them in return using the Clinton Initiative to launder the money. She sells access and God knows what else and has them donate the fee to CGI where she, Bill and Chelsea use it for their own purposes and send a fraction of it to charity while the buyers get access, favors and a tax write off for charitable contributions. What a family of scam artists. That’s why she deleted 30,000 emails about “her daughters wedding...right.


23 posted on 05/25/2016 6:33:31 PM PDT by vigilence (Vigilence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: relictele

Wapo is getting nervous... covering other contingencies. Frankly I thing the McAuliffe investigation and the move to dump the DNC chair are early signs that Obama has decided... Hillary is going down. An indictment is coming. Obama is boiling the frog slowly... telegraphic it. Because she has to fall the right way.


24 posted on 05/25/2016 6:53:30 PM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: vigilence

“She still hasn’t properly answered why she set up a private server. She has said that it was for her convenience but that in hindsight it was a bad choice, a mistake.”

Even that doesn’t wash. Anybody who has maintained a server knows it’s a pain in the @ss. ‘Convenience’ has nothing to do with it.


25 posted on 05/25/2016 6:57:05 PM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: NRx

Hillaryous Rotten Criminal and rules? What are you smoking? Many criminals never stop until they are incarcerated or eliminated.

The greatest crime couple in the history of America WILL NOT STOP.


26 posted on 05/25/2016 7:25:42 PM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRx


27 posted on 05/25/2016 8:04:42 PM PDT by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRx

Fortunately, the comments to the WaPo editorial indicate a considerable number of readers that are wise to Hillary’s coverup crimes. (Regrettably, there are also still a smaller number of Hillary trolls who evidently still see no Hillary evil...)


28 posted on 05/25/2016 9:53:12 PM PDT by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NRx

So what?

She obviously just doesn’t give a sh*t for rules, either those of the United States or anyone else.

Rules are for the Little People.


29 posted on 05/25/2016 11:08:25 PM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt
BS! Lots of it was classified, so the behavior was illegal. As for urging the FBI to finish its own investigation soon, so all information about this troubling episode will be before the voters, horse manure. They want it to drag out and hope Hillary is elected so she can pardon herself.

Yep - and she had to sign documents indicating she was aware and could be prosecuted "up to death" if she violated the rules.

30 posted on 05/26/2016 3:06:19 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: trebb

President cannot pardon self. Had it been so, Nixon would have done it. One important thing here and why she has to be gotten out before she might win the election, a president cannot be indicted. Only way to remove is by impeachment. They wrestled with all this during Nixon’s time.


31 posted on 05/26/2016 3:19:43 AM PDT by Mouton (The insurrection laws maintain the status quo now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson