Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: walkingdead

Yes, and occupying public property and by implication daring the authorities to evict them. While armed.
Its not prudent to make even implied threats like this, unless they were actually inviting violence, in which case it was also poorly thought out.

Also, its not prudent to make such a demonstration in such an isolated place. At least the Bundy’s in Nevada attracted crowds of sympathisers as witnesses.

Their cause is fundamentally sympathetic, and it can be pushed in a way that will invite public support and shame the bureaucrats, but that will require a very different approach.


9 posted on 05/24/2016 4:33:11 PM PDT by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: buwaya

Never said it was prudent or a great idea, just that the area that they occupied was one of the only fed gov places where guns are allowed. A fact often overlooked.


13 posted on 05/24/2016 5:10:37 PM PDT by walkingdead (It's easy, you just don't lead 'em as much....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson