Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MeganC

National security should be able to preempt Tribal Sovereignty esp if Tribal Sovereignty is used to cover up illegal, federal crimes being committee with the tribe’s knowledge on their territory, and they are incapable of doing anything about it.

Also, since it involves the transportation of drugs and weapons from another foreign country across our country’s borders, it is wholly a federal jurisdiction issue.

No cooperation with the feds equals no federal money, health care, schools, roads, sanitation, no nothing, unless Obama/Lynch like what is going on and intend to keep it that way.


67 posted on 05/24/2016 4:41:50 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: MadMax, the Grinning Reaper

“National security should be able to preempt Tribal Sovereignty...”

And public safety and national security should be able to preempt the Bill of Rights. Isn’t that what we keep hearing from the statists?

I’d be more inclined to agree with all of this except for the fact that this administration doesn’t give a damn about securing the border.

So since we can agree that this little melodrama isn’t about securing the border (insert laugh track here) then the question begs to be asked what is on the tribal land that the Federal government wants to control?


68 posted on 05/24/2016 4:47:58 PM PDT by MeganC (The Republic of The United States of America: 7/4/1776 to 6/26/2015 R.I.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson