Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dave W
Another point to make, is that today's elections are not the same as when Reagan was president.

Perhaps, but if this poll is accurate, compare it to 1980:

1980: Reagan/Carter
Republicans were 85/11
Democrats were 27/67

2016: Trump/Clinton
Republicans are 85/8
Democrats are 11/86

Trump has a way to go to match Reagan's appeal with Democrats. But, the 1980 election was 43/28/23, or D+15.

That kind of imbalance in party affiliation simply isn't going to happen in 2016. So, Trump doesn't need the same level of Democrat crossover.

However, I agree with your comment about Senate control. I haven't looked at what seats are vulnerable, but unless Trump can put those states in play and boost Republican turnout, we could have mixed control of Congress.

110 posted on 05/22/2016 2:25:05 PM PDT by justlurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]


To: justlurking

Interesting numbers and I agree completely with your comments.


113 posted on 05/22/2016 2:41:13 PM PDT by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

To: justlurking
but unless Trump can put those states in play and boost Republican turnout, we could have mixed control of Congress.

I'm concerned about a tendency to "split the difference." I suspect any RATs that crossover for Trump will not vote R for the Senate.

119 posted on 05/22/2016 3:09:50 PM PDT by gogeo (Donald Trump. Because it's finally come to that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson