Indeed. In the majority of programmes on the telly these days the male(s) in the picture are always portrayed as buffoons that the females always are having to rescue from one situation or another.
While the women have all the brains and every situation is about how she is the one so necessary for everything to continue functioning despite the blundering male.
No strong and capable housewife content to take care of the children and maintain a happy and caring home for the family to take pride in while the man is out working to support everyone on his meagre earnings. Even sometimes on his not-so-meagre earnings. The wife (if they are married, not always the case) must have an equivalent job that pays just as well or preferably more so, because after all the male should not be the main provider, no. Only a cave-man still believes in such outmoded concepts.
That being the case, why would a man want to be in a relationship where he is bound to a competitor who views him as not much more than another source of income and a constant source of problems and needs for rescueing whilst also constantly expecting sex?
Everyone knows women are far better off after the divorce when she has him by the 3@11s and can then go out and DO BETTER -with all she acquired from him in her pocket.
Meanwhile, in real life, how many women do you know who have married a man LESS intelligent or capable than herself? Women generally are uninterested in marrying down.