Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why the Second Amendment is under attack this week
Examiner ^ | May 16, 2016 | Dave Workman

Posted on 05/16/2016 10:09:54 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo

It’s a tradition as old as yellow journalism, “Bash the Second Amendment” week, and it was off to a vigorous start with last night’s debut of “Under the Gun,” touted as a “documentary” hosted by Katie Couric and broadcast on Epix.

The press seems to relish in doing gun control stories in the week leading up to the annual convention of the National Rifle Association. The NRA gathers this coming weekend in Louisville, and in addition to the Couric program, there’s an anti-gun opinion piece in today’s Seattle Times from Jerry Large, and another column in today’s Daily Californian that will infuriate Second Amendment activists.

The last time this column discussed this tradition, we called it “Bash the NRA Week.” But it’s not just that single organization under attack these days. Gun prohibitionists have dropped all pretense, attacking the Second Amendment, itself, and the much broader “gun lobby” that includes the Second Amendment Foundation, Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, Gun Owners of America and all the state and local gun clubs, plus tens of millions of gun owners not affiliated with any group, but who cherish their right to own and use firearms.

In the Daily Californian, writer Jaskrit Bhalla Shifa, described as “a member of the greater Bay Area community,” wonders, “whether or not the ability for American citizens to obtain guns should be allowed because of safety, as well as various interpretations of the Second Amendment of the Constitution.” Second Amendment advocates would tell Shifa that there is only one interpretation that counts, the one handed down by the Supreme Court in June 2008.

Shifa further contends, “The Second Amendment does not say anywhere that each individual has the right to bear arms and exclusively states that this right pertains to militias.

(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: 2a; 2ndamendment; banglist; california; demagogicparty; epix; guncontrol; jaskritbhalla; jaskritbhallashifa; katiecouric; memebuilding; nra; partisanmediashill; partisanmediashills; secondamendment; stephaniesoechtig; underthegun; vcdl; yahoo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: Mr. Mojo

gun grabber psychobunny jaskrit bhalla hiding behind a camera

21 posted on 05/17/2016 7:41:51 AM PDT by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zeugma

Re: “Why do you use MSN.com as your homepage?”

Loading time isn’t really an issue. Five or ten seconds at most.

I always open Microsoft Outlook first for my email (which can be slow sometimes), so I’m already on the Microsoft Network.

Politically, MSN.com is All Left, All The Time, but its homepage has excellent news capsules on all the major stories of the day.


22 posted on 05/17/2016 7:55:16 AM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MamaTexan; SteveH

Lol...when you’re left of the 9th Circus on guns, you’re left of just about anyone. Strange that she was even quoted, given her unknown and completely unaccomplished status.


23 posted on 05/17/2016 9:19:00 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
Strange that she was even quoted

Not really, just liberal bias in action - it's a blurb from the new mockumentary hosted by Katie Couric.

24 posted on 05/17/2016 9:55:51 AM PDT by MamaTexan (I am a person as created by the Law of Nature, not a person as created by the laws of Man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Ken H

Looking forward to seeing a sea of green on that map one day soon...


25 posted on 05/17/2016 11:13:48 AM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: IncPen
The First Amendment is much more dangerous than the Second.

But the first is unenforceable without the second.

26 posted on 05/17/2016 1:08:28 PM PDT by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pontiac
...“A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state”...

Which simply acknowledges the need for and desirability of a citizen militia. It says nothing that limits the right to the militia. Any "C" student in English can tell you that.

27 posted on 05/17/2016 1:13:41 PM PDT by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: The Working Man
The right to own and use their weapons may not be taken away from them or have undue or unjust regulations placed upon their rights to own, use and carry them where they desire.

No good. The words undue and unjust are subject to interpretation, and you know how leftists would interpret them.

"The right to own and use their weapons may not be taken away from them or have regulations placed upon their rights to own, use and carry them where they desire" works better.

Even freed criminals and crazies have the right to self defense. If they shouldn't be armed, they shouldn't be running around loose.

28 posted on 05/17/2016 1:19:31 PM PDT by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

Excellent Points. Keep the ‘weasel’ words as few as possible.


29 posted on 05/17/2016 4:10:37 PM PDT by The Working Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: The Working Man

Actually ‘Regulated’ at the time of the revolution meant ‘drilled’. So a well regulated militia would be a well drilled as to the militia would be made regular or Uniform in their performance.


30 posted on 05/18/2016 11:56:30 AM PDT by Pontiac (The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson