What you lack there is any sort of real evidence of a direct connection - evidence we DO have about the Saudis.
It being 2016, it’s time to come to grips with a few things that weren’t so apparent in 2005. Among these things is that we went into Iraq on the basis of deliberately false information supplied by the Bush administration, and we have no certain boundary on the lengths to which information supplied to us has been altered to this end. Also among these things is the deep involvement of Saudi royals in the 9/11 attacks.
“What you lack there is any sort of real evidence of a direct connection - evidence we DO have about the Saudis.”
And what you’ve offered is opinion and attitude - nothing.
“we went into Iraq on the basis of deliberately false information supplied by the Bush administration”
Yeah of heard those claims. But since you’ve offered nothing but conclusion, I’ll help.
Wilson - Bush lied when he truthfully said that British intelligence indicated Saddam was trying to buy uranium from an African country.
And/or, it was all about Bush claims about stockpiles of WMDs. In truth, that was only one of the reasons, both for President Bush and President Clinton.