I know he’s popular here but the rule of law demands that agents of law follow court injunctions. There isn’t a “But...” to that statement. If he’s using his position to insulate himself from consequences that is ++ungood.
It also really doesn’t help that his second in command has admitted to contempt for not carrying out court orders. That’s just gratuitous.
Yes there is a BUT.
The US Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land.
If Federal laws are unconstitutional, it is a DUTY to not comply.
Complying with “laws” is the mantra of the Tyrant. Supporting and defending the Constitution is anathema to them.
beautiful pontifications, do facts get in your way ?