It doesn’t matter, really. If an honest review shows a plan to have too high a deficit, then I’m okay with fixing it.
It’s NOT fixing it that says something negative to me. If there’s a design flaw in a bridge, I’d hope the engineer wouldn’t let his ego get in the way of fixing it. So, this is a positive thing.
I want 2 things regarding taxes:
1. I want a tax reduction that spurs the economy and also lowers my taxes.
2. I want a tax plan that also has an excellent chance of passing Congress, even if republicans end up losing the Senate.
Besides, taxes was not the basis of the primary campaign. The major issue there was national security, immigration, jobs, and trade.
Besides, taxes was not the basis of the primary campaign. The major issue there was national security, immigration, jobs, and trade.<<<<
Actually, you are partially correct. Taxes weren’t specifically emphasised during the rallys, but they WERE (are) listed, along with a rough-draft plan, on Trump’s web page. The taxes go hand in hand with jobs and trade as in bringing back the manufacturing base in addition to off shore funds. Tax adjustments need to happen to stimulate investment among other things.
Additionally, spending power has been touched upon as in increasing wealth along with a reduction in obamacare costs.
It takes listening to a LOT of rallys to gather up the information and piece it together, and of course listening to the press blurbs he’s put out helps too.
The single best ways to deal with jobs and trade are via taxes and regulations.