Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: simpson96

Why was the question off limits!!!!!!!!

And they describe her as a "cooperating witness"????

Any of my clients who were "cooperating witnesses" usually knew they were cooperating so they were not named in the True Bill, and began their testimony with something along the line of "Forgive me Father, for I have sinned

16 posted on 05/10/2016 2:36:34 PM PDT by Strac6 (The primaries are only the semi-finals. ALL THAT MATTERS IS DEFEATING HILLARY IN NOVEMBER.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Strac6

Excerpt...

The questions that were considered off limits had to do with the procedure used to produce emails to the State Department so they could possibly be released publicly, the people said.

Mills, an attorney herself, was not supposed to be asked questions about that — and ultimately never was in the recent interview — because it was considered confidential as an example of attorney-client privilege, the people said.

So far, investigators have found scant evidence tying Clinton to criminal wrongdoing, though they are still probing the case aggressively and charges have not been ruled out.

In recent weeks, they have been interviewing Mills and other aides. One former State Department staffer who worked on Hillary Clinton’s private email server, Bryan Pagliano, was granted immunity so he would cooperate as part of the probe.

There is no indication a grand jury has been convened in the case.


23 posted on 05/10/2016 3:20:51 PM PDT by newfreep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson