No, the informed evolutionists have always conceded their inability to produce a workable model for abiogenesis. They pick up from the point of life and pretty much ignore anything before.
That is the context of my statement.
I understand the context of your statement. And you are correct that most proponents of Darwinism separate “abiogenesis” from Darwinian evolution.
But actual informed evolutionists do understand that it is a continuum without distinction as it is all simply physics-chemical processes.
Otherwise abiogenesis accepts the élan vital concept.