What does Obama expect to possibly accomplish by sending a few hundred troops into a war zone with no plan, no mission and no purpose other than to be shot at and potentially killed.
Why does Congress approve this completely irrational policy.
There are too few troops to accomplish anything. They have no mission or purpose. They are just supposed to be targets for our enemies.
The story that they are not in combat is another complete lie.
Where are the so called conservatives in Congress when our troops are put in this position?
1 posted on
05/05/2016 2:16:47 PM PDT by
detective
To: detective
"What does Obama expect to possibly accomplish by sending a few hundred troops into a war zone with no plan, no mission and no purpose other than to be shot at and potentially killed."
I think your question answers itself. It gives a lift to the Muslim terrorists in the jihad against the Great Satan.
2 posted on
05/05/2016 2:24:54 PM PDT by
Truth29
To: detective
Odungo lie?....it’s his way of exposing our most needed...
Our best trained.....our bravest....most patriot...most
admired ( something he is not)....to the whims
of his Muslims “advisors”,in the WH.
3 posted on
05/05/2016 2:26:15 PM PDT by
Doogle
(( USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon sThailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: detective
4 posted on
05/05/2016 2:30:23 PM PDT by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
To: detective
“Let me be clear, there will be no boots on the ground.”
To: detective; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; freeangel; kalee; TWhiteBear; Salvation; ...
![](http://i48.tinypic.com/55gokj.jpg)
sending a few hundred troops into a war zone with no plan, no mission and no purpose other than to be shot at and potentially killed.
Sorry to tell you, that is the purpose.
7 posted on
05/05/2016 2:49:26 PM PDT by
LucyT
To: detective
".....Despite Americans being killed on the battlefield with ISIS,
the White House has maintained U.S. troops are simply acting as advisors in a dangerous region but are not involved in combat......"Yes, I remember that same language in the early 1960's. Someplace in Asia I believe.
9 posted on
05/05/2016 2:56:06 PM PDT by
rockinqsranch
(Dems, Libs, Socialists Call 'em what you will, they all have fairies livin' in their trees.)
To: detective
Obama has killed more troops than anyone since the last real war, and all to no purpose. Or else, fighting on the wrong side.
“The White House is Lying.” Yes, every hour of every day.
10 posted on
05/05/2016 2:58:32 PM PDT by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: detective
![](https://img.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src=https://img.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp-content/uploads/sites/33/2016/05/keating-surfing.jpg&w=480)
Charles Keating IV, SEAL killed in attack
11 posted on
05/05/2016 3:08:31 PM PDT by
gaijin
To: detective
Few hundred? You’re a bit behind - it’s now over 4,000 pairs of boots on the ground in Iraq.
That’s not counting those troops assigned to Kuwait who pull extra duty in Iraq.
12 posted on
05/05/2016 3:26:51 PM PDT by
PeteB570
( Islam is the sea in which the Terrorist Shark swims. The deeper the sea the larger the shark.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson