RE: I also do not think that Trump was implying that Cruz’s dad was involved in the assassination of JFK. There’s no evidence of that.
Then why bother bringing it up?
The country is starved for solutions to the issues that face us. If Trump is to attack Cruz, I want him to attack Cruz’s POLICIES. I want to know how Trump’s policies differ and are BETTER than Cruz’s.
In other words, it would have been great to see a one on one debate with Cruz ON THE ISSUES. Trump of course refused to do so.
Instead, we get garbage like this.
So I disagree, Trump WAS IMPLYING that it was Cruz’s father. Otherwise, it would not have been brought up.
Maybe he wants to know why Cruz’s dad was hanging out with Oswald.
If Trump wanted to say that he though rafael cruz was involved in the assassination of Kennedy, I’m sure he would have said exactly that. Trump pretty much says whatever he wants.
I would have also refused a one on one debate with Cruz.
There is no point at all in legitimizing an opponent who can no longer win by recognizing him in a debate.
That is a situation where Trump has everything to lose, and Cruz has everything to gain, so I am sure Cruz wanted that very badly, but he was never going to get it.
When you win the super bowl 42-7, you don’t give the losing team a 5th quarter.
But we can disagree, man, it’s alright. I gots no ill will.
What Trump was implying was, who is or was Rafael B. Cruz? Really? A man whose name and birthdate match those of someone who died in 2012?
And thus who is Ted Cruz, really?
There sure is some interesting stuff here about the old man’s past and his identity ... Aside from questions about his ties to Cuba Russia and/ or certain interests operating in the US during the events that led to Kennedy’s assassination
Maybe there was a lot more to be discovered... But now that Ted is out of the race, the past may yet again stay in the past