Skip to comments.
The Rush Limbaugh Show, M-F, 12noon-3PM, WOR-AM, Wednesday, May 4th, 2016.
The EIB Network ^
| Wednesday, May 4th, 2016
| Rush Limbaugh
Posted on 05/04/2016 8:57:11 AM PDT by Carriage Hill
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 581-595 next last
To: Pravious
--
Rush's blather reminds me of Cruz's utterly classless (and boring) drama queen exit speech last night - too bitter to even recognize Trump's accomplishment or even mention his name. --
I give Cruz a pass on that. After telling the world what he thought of Trump in the morning, he couldn't very well take it back half a day later. Trump didn't need congratulations from Cruz, is probably better off not getting congratulations from Cruz, and Cruz is allowed to save face by sticking to his sentiments. It'll all work out.
161
posted on
05/04/2016 9:34:00 AM PDT
by
Cboldt
To: MUDDOG
Reagan would not side with rioters.
Reagan would no attack another candidate with half-truths and outright lies (even the Democrat candidate)
Reagan was likeable
Reagan didn’t insult republican voters that opposed him
the list goes on and on.
To: dforest
Cruz made his losing miscalculation right out of the gate. He spent all his time and effort courting evangelicals and getting endorsements from pastors.
I recall making a post about the time of the Iowa caucus that people were not looking for a 'Preacher-in-Chief'.
163
posted on
05/04/2016 9:34:58 AM PDT
by
TomGuy
To: LNV
OMG. I've said this before: Glenn Beck is certifiable.
Oh well, at least Glenn can stop his fast now, and go back to filling his pie-hole with junk food.
164
posted on
05/04/2016 9:35:02 AM PDT
by
nutmeg
(..and the Oscar goes to: Michelle Fields!)
To: Larry Lucido
165
posted on
05/04/2016 9:35:11 AM PDT
by
Carriage Hill
( A society grows great when old men plant trees, in whose shade they know they will never sit.)
To: MUDDOG
1976 Elephant Primary:
Blue indicates a win by Ford, red a win by Reagan.
166
posted on
05/04/2016 9:35:24 AM PDT
by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
Comment #167 Removed by Moderator
To: Pelham
Now hes equating Ted Cruz to Ronald Reagan in 1976.Now hes getting Beckish
168
posted on
05/04/2016 9:35:39 AM PDT
by
datricker
(Its morning again in America! Don't let the putznuggets steal your future. Vote Trump)
You brain-dead trumpsters are in for a rude awakening; it will not be long before you are disappointed. A president trump may be better than clinton, but it will not be good for this country. Just remember Ted Cruz will still be in the Senate working hard to restore our constitution.
i think it has been confirmed that neither Ted Cruz or any of his supporters have the gift of prophecy.
Come aboard, bring your passion and determination, and help save this country
169
posted on
05/04/2016 9:35:48 AM PDT
by
DEEP_e
To: odawg
Sounds to me like Limbaugh is carrying water for the GOPe, and until there is some figuring about how to message and manage the #NeverTrump battles, Limbaugh has to filibuster - prattle on irrelevancies.
170
posted on
05/04/2016 9:35:57 AM PDT
by
Cboldt
To: scooby321
Very Proud of Rush as I think he will go after Senator Ben Sasse and #NeverTrump along with a good blasting of Mitt Romney One would hope.
To: scooby321
Nuthin wrong with el Rushbo
To: datricker
Not listening, just reading the thread.
Rush was on board with blatant, pathological lying???
How could I have agreed with this man for 15+ years, and now suddenly see some serious amorality in the guy?
I honestly thought, of the two tacks he could take this morning, pretending he had always been on the Trump train but was giving the rest a good fair chance would have been better for his career. Moaning and mourning the Cruz campaign is consistent but not bright.
173
posted on
05/04/2016 9:36:14 AM PDT
by
Yaelle
(Tinkerbelle glittering up the runway for Trump Force One!)
To: Third Person
Tell us Rush why do you not understand that what you are going on about had nothing to do with Cruz - because this had nothing to do with Cruz.
It was about Trump. He is pretending the establishment was against - Cruz only?
174
posted on
05/04/2016 9:37:02 AM PDT
by
Williams
(Dear God please save us from the democrats. And the republicans.)
To: All
This is a total waste of time. The voters rejected Cruz in a BIG way. Get over it, Rush. We don't like the guy...and we certainly don't want to listen to you talk about him for three hours a day. Sheesh.
Will check the thread later. Good luck.
To: advertising guy
176
posted on
05/04/2016 9:37:25 AM PDT
by
Yaelle
(Tinkerbelle glittering up the runway for Trump Force One!)
To: TomGuy
Now Rush is saying Cruz’s loss was because the establishment was against Cruz.
Huh? Rush must’ve missed the establishment choosing Cruz over Trump.
177
posted on
05/04/2016 9:38:30 AM PDT
by
MUDDOG
To: HombreSecreto
You are going to date us with that.;-)
178
posted on
05/04/2016 9:39:18 AM PDT
by
stayathomemom
(Beware of kittens modifying your posts.)
To: central_va
179
posted on
05/04/2016 9:39:30 AM PDT
by
MUDDOG
To: LNV
He competed and lost.
He competed and got schlonged...
180
posted on
05/04/2016 9:39:33 AM PDT
by
ripnbang
("An armed man is a citizen, an unarmed man a subject)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 581-595 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson