>I really don’t like Ted Cruz but, he might do well on the SC. Having a likable personality is not required. You don’t have to pay attention to public opinion. You can write scathing dissenting opinions.
>I think he’d be a fairly reliable conservative/moderate vote
And what if he decided to rule against Trump’s program out of spite? This isn’t the most stable guy I’ve seen run for president.
Ted Cruz is now tagged as the premier liar in the Senate, one of the greatest liars of all time. Not to be trusted.
He is "Lucifer in the Flesh" and "The most miserable SOB" in Washington.
Forget for the moment whether any of this is fair.
Do you really expect a President to nominate a man with this reputation?
At one time, I thought it would be the perfect fit, and if Cruz had gotten out when so many urged, he could have made the deal for this. It's just not reasonable now.