OVERWHELMINGLY REJECTED! Got that? So maybe there is hope. At least until the next shareholders meeting. Some of the "deniers" may get a "good talking to" before the next one and have their priorities uh, corrected. Yeah, that's it.
1 posted on
05/01/2016 7:44:23 AM PDT by
rktman
To: rktman
Global Warming Insurance ?
To: rktman
It would make far more sense for them to evaluate the risks and costs associated with governmental increase in taxes and regulations based on whipping up global warming fears.
Government shutting down coal mining is a far greater investment risk to Buffet than an increase in global temperature of 0.1°.
4 posted on
05/01/2016 7:54:00 AM PDT by
KarlInOhio
(An orange jumpsuit is the new black pantsuit.)
To: rktman
Insurance companies adjust to threats and always have.
When mold became known as a major health issue, insurance companies excluded it from coverage.
Ling-term imaginary weather conditions don’t affect annually written policies unless those conditions are ignored for long periods.
9 posted on
05/01/2016 9:12:59 AM PDT by
SaxxonWoods
(Ride To The Sound Of The Guns.)
To: rktman; 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; AlexW; alrea; ...
To: rktman
Warren the hypocrite stays the course of hypocrisy. Lol.
14 posted on
05/02/2016 4:09:33 PM PDT by
jwalsh07
To: rktman
I'll bet the SEC or some other regulatory body over publicly traded companies will ultimately start requiring climate change mitigation activities as a condition of listing.
15 posted on
05/02/2016 4:17:53 PM PDT by
Truth29
To: rktman
16 posted on
05/02/2016 4:26:40 PM PDT by
PROCON
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson