Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim 0216
It's settled and when he was running for the Senate, he was on a show in Texas and asked, point blank: WHAT IS A NBC?

His answer was EXACTLY, WORD FOR WORD, what I have posted here.

Now, he won't talk about it and refused to have it adjudicated.

So, I ask YOU and the others here, who refuse to accept SETTLED LAW, is our government wrong and was Cruz also wrong in 2012?

279 posted on 04/30/2016 10:35:53 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies ]


To: nopardons

Cruz himself is certainly not mandatory authority on the subject of NBC.

Whatever part of the generic subject of NBC the government has “settled”, it hasn’t settled every possible contingency. Cruz’s case is unique. That is why we have courts - because no law can cover every possible contingency. The Constitution created federal courts to resolve individual CASES AND CONTROVERSIES regarding federal questions as Cruz’s case certainly is.

Cruz’s NBC eligibility is an individual case and controversy of a federal question that needs resolution in a federal court.


309 posted on 05/01/2016 7:54:04 AM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson