Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Innovative
There will be other times and opportunities for Cruz later on.

Absolutely. His sights are set for much bigger things: President of the North American Union. He, Heidi, the CFR, WTO---they are dead serious about this. If you don't think so, you better start doing some reading.

In that position, he will be able to complete the things he failed at while in the Senate---amnesty, for one. And he got TPA passed, which enables Obama to unilaterally pass TPP, and there are other trade agreements coming...TPP is NAFTA on Steroids, it's said. What follows TPP will be trade agreements powered by nuke reactors, comparatively.

Ted was unable to get his increase of 500,000 new H1B workers (the GOOD jobs); but in the NAU that won't be a problem. Cruz and his fellow republicans have funded the resettlement in America of Syrians, Somalis, and Sudanese Muslims until the end of the Fed fiscal year 2017, and by then it'll be in the millions. Imagine how many Trojan Horse terror cells will be in that bunch.

The Omnibus Spending bill of the Republicans funds all of Obama's plans, and more.

Cruz vowed in 2014 that Obamacare would be repealed if the Republicans ran the senate. That won't matter because the NAU will have its own Mexi-Cana-US healthcare plan based on Canada's socialized medicine.

Heidi's work with Robert Zoellnick (Father of TPP) in the Bush White House, and her highly praised work for the North American Union as she was a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, will happen pretty fast unless we can get Trump in.

Under Ted's leadership Globalists will have succeeded in their goal of removing all borders from the USA, its constitution, moved its jobs offshore, and for the jobs that can't be moved, they'll be filled by Indians and Chinese, which is in the TPP agreement, made possible by Ted's slick parliamentary shenanigans (like cloture votes, etc.) that Ted used to get TPA passed (so that congress had no say in any new trade agreements and could not filibuster one, and negotiations on new trade agreements would be done privately with only the POTUS involved.)

31 posted on 04/29/2016 8:27:43 PM PDT by gg188 (Ted Cruz, R - Goldman Sachs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: gg188

Bookmark.. Great post.


32 posted on 04/29/2016 8:29:13 PM PDT by JerseyDvl (#NeverHillary now that we've gotten rid of Lying LOSER Ted Cruz.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: gg188

I was just trying to be kind about future opportunities for Cruz.

I knew he was ambitious and an opportunist, but wouldn’t have thought in my wildest imagination the things you are describing. Though now that you are pointing them out, they do seem credible.

How could people think that Cruz is a conservative?!


39 posted on 04/29/2016 8:41:52 PM PDT by Innovative ("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson