The whole notion that homosexuals behave in stable, monogamous relationships was a lie crafted by the media.
It was never about weddings, it was all about legitimizing deviant behavior.
WINNER !
I was close enough friends with several homosexuals (before Lawrence made them into monsters) that they confided in me the content of their homo-themed movie collections. They had extensive porn, but also "serious" movies with "gay" themes. Now even the movie-streaming services offer entire categories of these propaganda flicks. Anyway, the movies almost ALWAYS involved extensive sluttiness, understood and accepted as an amoral and integral part of the homosexual lifestyle. There was no question, and no attempt to paint them as illegitimate or wrong.
Even the well known, fairly mainstream movie Philadelphia feature the main character (Tom Hanks) fighting against "discrimination" because his law firm wanted to fire him after he was diagnosed with AIDS, acquired, not surprisingly, during a public sexual tryst with another anonymous queer IN a movie theater while being in a "committed" relationship with another man (Antonio Banderas.)
All of the other homo-movies are the same, or much much worse.
On the other hand, it WAS about “weddings.” Money, liquor, photography, clothes, pleasure, parties, opulence, picturesque locale, conspicuous consumption! It just wasn’t about marriage.
I know I’ve read that before, but this is the first time it speaks the truth.