[Sasha_S]

It’s more complex than you’re making it out to be certainly.

There are third-party candidates, of course, and there is the simple fact that not everyone views being ‘Not-Hillary’ as a compelling reason to make a positive assertion of support (in the form of one’s vote) for any given candidate.

We could, of course, go back to the old ‘Voting one’s conscience’ vs. ‘Voting strategically’ argument, but that boils down to a matter of personal philosophy and thus, I don’t think, can either side be productively argued here.

[dragnet2]

Uh huh.

[PJBankard]

Sasha_S wrote:

It’s more complex than you’re making it out to be certainly.

There are third-party candidates, of course, and there is the simple fact that not everyone views being ‘Not-Hillary’ as a compelling reason to make a positive assertion of support (in the form of one’s vote) for any given candidate.

We could, of course, go back to the old ‘Voting one’s conscience’ vs. ‘Voting strategically’ argument, but that boils down to a matter of personal philosophy and thus, I don’t think, can either side be productively argued here.

mkjessup, I think we have another coming soon.

[dragnet2]

It’s more complex than you’re making it out to be certainly.

No it's not. Alleging you haven't found a candidate yet is 100% bull sh*t.