Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind; All
The primary system has little to do with the constitutionally enumerated procedure for electing a president.
”Article II, Section 1, Clause 2: Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.

12th Amendment: The Electors shall meet in their respective states, and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; ..."

So how can the primary system not be rigged?

33 posted on 04/26/2016 11:22:33 AM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Amendment10

Primaries, which are run by state governments, need not be related to political parties at all. The two parties have used laws to favor themselves.

The only practical alternative to private associations like political parties is a jungle primary with the top two finishers facing off, unless plurality decides the winner. A plurality winner system wouldn’t last long. Again, I’m speaking of a situation without political parties.


54 posted on 04/26/2016 11:54:36 AM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson