What’s your point? That a physical explanation for a phenomenon negates the phenomenon?
I believe the point TexasGator is making is the phenomenon you see presented in the article is not the phenomenon of conception, nor is it of a soul being created. It is just a biochemical reaction to an enzyme that opened calcium channels in the egg’s cell membrane such that zinc was released and triggered an electron cascade in the reaction. No eggs were fertilized in this study.
“Whats your point? That a physical explanation for a phenomenon negates the phenomenon?”
Without sperm, there is no conception.