Since boycotts are ineffective and tend to cause the other side to have buy ins the above approach is a good one.
The overall point that we lose effectiveness when we withdraw is well made
They are a corporation the in order to survive HAS to have increased sales. They will not survive with even consistent sales, their stock will tank.
A boycott is very effective if properly and maintained. Even a 20% reduction is sales will kill them and a higher percentage will send a message in capital letters to the rest of industry thinking about this stupid policy.
The problem is, Americans do not have the will to maintain a boycott until the corporations concede. Americans think they cannot survive without their new “stuff”.