Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Activist Sues RNC and Reince Priebus for Rigging Delegates
Stumpin for Trump ^ | 4/22/2016

Posted on 04/22/2016 12:48:10 PM PDT by BlackFemaleArmyColonel

We started writing about Ted Cruz using shady tactics to steal delegates a while back. What makes this even more appalling is we also pointed out that Lyin Ted Cruz had claimed he was against a Contested Convention. The only way Ted Cruz or John Kasich can win is via delegate theft. They both have been mathematically eliminated from the race by the voters.

We also pointed out that delegates can be bought. As Hot Air notes;

“But if you want to pretend these conversations aren’t taking place in the Cruz and Kasich camps, well… I’d love to know what color the sky is in your world. The campaigns are allowed to provide travel expenses, deliver “gifts” and make promises of future meetings and events in the home states of the delegates. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck you can all it an eagle all day long but you’re not going to be inspiring much confidence in the voters.”

Donald Trump previously called the RNC and Reince Priebus a “disgrace” and blasted the party’s delegate system as “absolutely rigged.”He discusses the delegate buying with Sean Hannity in this video.

(Excerpt) Read more at stumpinfortrump.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2016denyvoters; 2016electionfraud; 2016voterfraud; bfac

1 posted on 04/22/2016 12:48:10 PM PDT by BlackFemaleArmyColonel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyCaptain

Good, all these delegate rigging games need to be exposed and given as much publicity as possible so the voters can stage uprisings in their states and bring about change.

No doubt the party insiders will use any trick in the book to thwart the will of the voters and have things the way they want them.


2 posted on 04/22/2016 2:17:23 PM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyCaptain

The RNC is a private organization. It can do what it wants. The lawsuits have failed before.


3 posted on 04/22/2016 3:17:18 PM PDT by Iowa David (Cruz 2016 - Before it's too late)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyCaptain

The Democrat Party’s work is never done.


4 posted on 04/22/2016 3:19:11 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (The most vocal supporters of a good con man are the victims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyCaptain

Why would anyone give credence to an article that uses slur names for the candidates?


5 posted on 04/22/2016 3:25:28 PM PDT by Savage Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Will88

And get rid of the electoral college and have popular votes for Supreme Court justices as well!


6 posted on 04/22/2016 3:26:59 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Stick a fork in America; she's done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Savage Rider

Don’t you know Trump supporters can’t write a post without using vile and nasty names.

Until such time as Trump actually secures 1237 delegates Cruz has a realistic chance of putting together a coalition to beat Trump. If Trump does not reach 1237 on the first ballot it is very likely Cruz will win on the second or third ballot. That’s the way politics works!!


7 posted on 04/22/2016 3:35:42 PM PDT by Laserman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Iowa David
The lawsuits have failed before.

Failed to do what?

8 posted on 04/22/2016 3:37:37 PM PDT by gogeo (Donald Trump. Because it's finally come to that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Iowa David
The RNC is a private organization. It can do what it wants. The lawsuits have failed before.

Lawsuits aren't needed, simply that the people who make up a political party in a state demand that the selection of delegates reflect the will of the voters and not the will of a small number of party insiders and activists.

This election has been a lesson in how these things are done in various states, and people don't like what they've learned.

9 posted on 04/22/2016 4:25:20 PM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
And get rid of the electoral college and have popular votes for Supreme Court justices as well!

Is that supposed to relate to something posted here?

10 posted on 04/22/2016 4:26:57 PM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Iowa David

Private businesses and organizations get sued all the time for fraud. “Those are the rules” that we wrote doesn’t cut it. There are class action lawsuits all the time.

Candidates and donors spend millions of dollars to win a primary and delegates and the party can change the results after the vote.

That is clearly fraud.


11 posted on 04/22/2016 4:29:35 PM PDT by Rad_J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gogeo

There was a lawsuit against the Republican party a few cycles ago about some issue with delegates or getting delegates. The courts have ruled political parties are private and this can make any rules they want.


12 posted on 04/22/2016 4:45:21 PM PDT by Iowa David (Cruz 2016 - Before it's too late)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Iowa David
Oh, i have no doubt they can make whatever rules they want.

The question is that, with all the (deservedly) negative press they've received...is it a victory at all?

The party insiders who have asserted their "right" to disregard the will of the voters...what do you think they've won?

How many of these farces of an electoral process do you think will survive?

And finally...in an election year where the outsider railing against insider influence has won the great majority of votes...how stupid is it for the party to be caught where it is?

13 posted on 04/22/2016 5:01:12 PM PDT by gogeo (Donald Trump. Because it's finally come to that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Will88

Just sayin’, might as well get rid of all checks on democracy while we’re at it.


14 posted on 04/22/2016 5:09:31 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Stick a fork in America; she's done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Just sayin’, might as well get rid of all checks on democracy while we’re at it.

A delegate selection system controlled by party officials and insiders is not a check on democracy, but a means of denying democracy to the citizens and voters.

15 posted on 04/22/2016 5:36:55 PM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Savage Rider

Why would anyone give credence to an article that uses slur names for the candidates?
___________________________________________________________

Why would anyone give credence to a candidate who uses lies to slur other candidates? That would be Ted Cruz.


16 posted on 04/22/2016 10:02:46 PM PDT by BlackFemaleArmyColonel (I am so very blessed! Thank You, JESUS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gogeo

I am pretty sure this year the RNC no matter what would be hated


17 posted on 04/23/2016 5:38:41 AM PDT by Iowa David (Cruz 2016 - Before it's too late)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson