Posted on 04/20/2016 7:36:57 PM PDT by Nachum
A federal judge ruled Wednesday that the Justice Department needs to make public at least a partial copy of a classified filing that seeks to keep details about Hillary Clinton's private server out of the public eye.
The ruling comes after the department submitted a classified filing to U.S. District Court Judge Randy Moss last month asking that he prevent certain information about the server from being released. In a motion filed on Tuesday, Vice News reporter Jason Leopold asked the court to deny that request.
Leopold argued that the department had submitted the filing "without prior permission from the court," or proper notice to Leopold, who has filed a Freedom of Information Act suit seeking details of what the FBI may know about the classified information Clinton improperly kept on her server.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...
The list, Ping
Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list
The DOJ needs to get Traitor Roberts to get this info stifiled.
Please add me to the ping list. Thank you!
Please add me to the ping list
Let’s call him “the Dread Traitor Roberts”
He certainly flys the Jolly Roger Hussein....
Bump
It is my understanding that if there is any spillage of classified information into an unauthorized location, such as a private server, that server, and the entire contents, becomes property of the government. Hence, all of the emails on that server may be subject to FOIA, certainly any emails previously deleted that were government related.
‘-
The judge isn’t doing much.
After every episode, it seems another entity is covering for Hillary.
I think this case is simple, and the delays are not good for truth seekers. The attempts to complicate a simple case are right out of the Clinton playbook - depends on the definition of “is.”
Oral Sex isn’t sex, how bout that one.
The coverup is in motion.
Thank you for the pings.
Clinton: She wants the people to elect her, but she doesn’t want them to know what she’s been up to .. and my guess would be it’s because it’s treasonous; and now the DOJ has virtually told the world they are not going to prosecute her. Nice of the Judge to reveal that.
How many DemocRATS will refuse to vote for her now that this revelation has been made public ..??
Guesses anyone ..?????????????????
Public, what the heck to you mean public? No one is covering this "news" the lame stream media is still playing the "Move along nothing to see here riff".
Let’s don’t. Way too classy. Something like POS Roberts would be more fitting.
Sorry, I guess everybody’s right except me .. so what the hell do I know.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.