Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sargon
I mention no names, my candidate can certainly withstand scrutiny, I ask all conservatives simply to consider whether their man is worthy.

Sargon, it isn't about me, it's about the candidate.


47 posted on 04/18/2016 11:47:03 AM PDT by nathanbedford ("Attack, repeat, attack!" Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: nathanbedford

As long as your candidate isn’t a born Canadian. No born Canadian could withstand scrutiny for the Presidency, and such a candidates’ supporters would be complicit in treason!

Talk about illegal immigration!


48 posted on 04/18/2016 11:52:54 AM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: nathanbedford
Sargon, it isn't about me, it's about the candidate.

Yes, it's about a winning candidate, Donald Trump, who you constantly dismiss and slander with the most transparent propaganda.

Ted Cruz has lost. He will have been mathematically eliminated after the next Tuesday or two. His only hope was to get the nomination at a contested GOP convention, which would irreparably splinter the party, and guarantee a GOP defeat in November.

Simply put, that's not going to happen. Not even the crooked GOPe is that stupid.

Trump is apparently a "liberal Democrat" who wants to:

Build a wall.
enforce the law.
deport them all.
end sanctuary cities.
end anchor babies.
moratorium on muslim immigration.
cut the taxes.
cut the spending.
cut the regulations.
cut the government.
cut the debt.
cut the epa.
repeal obamacare.
get the feds out and allow health insurance to be sold over state lines.
send education back to states.
get a handle on trade.
make trade deals in our own interests.
bring back capital.
bring back manufacturing.
bring back jobs.
strengthen the economy.
defend the second amendment
defend religious freedom.
appoint constitutional conservative judges.
rebuild our military.
bomb the shit out of isis.
end political correctness.
take the gop head-on.
take the media head-on.
take the liberals head-on.
and win, baby, win.

all of the above on a shoestring budget compared to most of the 16 competitors he’s beaten.
no pacs.
no big donors.

what’s democrat about any of the above?
What’s not conservative?
what’s not to like?

43 posted on Friday, April 15, 2016 9:13:49 PM by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!)

Over the weekend, there was a very well researched and documented article posted which clearly demonstrated that Donald Trump's conservative stances on issues like immigration are not new at all, and indeed he's been discussing many of these issues since the 1980's

It totally put the lie to the notion that Trump is a) liberal, and b) a late-comer to conservatism. Over the last 30-40 years, Donald Trump has been registered as a Republican for a longer period than as a Democrat.

If you want to criticize the man fairly, that's fine, but that's not what you do. You spin every single point in the most distorted manner possible.

For instance, the whole "Trump attacks reporters" smear has now been shown to be an absolute hoax. Just as the hysterical "Trump advocates violence" BS. The fact is, a very clear admonition is broadcast at the beginning of every single Trump rally, asking attendees to be peacable with protesters and to let security do their job.

That occurs at every rally, and yet the Media deliberately ignores that. Not to mention that there have been no fisticuffs at any Trump rallies to speak of, and for quite some time.

Smear, smear, smear. That is the tactic of the Left/Media/GOPe and Cruz campaign that can't win on substance.

If you've been paying any attention at all, you should have noticed that lately Ted Cruz literally can't string 2 sentences together in response to any question he's asked, without basically ignoring the question and pivoting to an immediate attack on Donald Trump. He's absolutely obsessed and desperate.

Cruz is actually running a distant 3rd place in many state polls throughout the Northeast, and has also plummeted in National polls as well since Wisconsin. That's because the People don't appreciate these "greased skid" setups (which Rush Limbaugh admitted to a few days ago) which were specifically put in place to benefit the designated GOPe insider and to exclude "outsiders" like Trump, Cruz, Paul, etc.

The only thing that changed is that Jeb Bush got squashed like an insect by Donald Trump, so the GOPe had to reluctantly steal the delegates for Ted Cruz instead of Jeb Bush. But it was rigged for the designated insider, and it's no secret. Was that "playing by the rules"? Yes, it was. And the rules are crooked. That is the perception, it's an accurate one, I believe, and, in any event, in politics, perception is reality.

Colorado Delegates Speak Out On The Steal

Donald Trump is the presumptive GOP nominee, and it's time to wrap your mind around that fact and start focusing on beating Hillary in the general election.

Now, if somehow the GOPe manages to steal the nomination from Trump (and, under the circumstances, that is what it will be, a theft) and award it to someone less deserving, I will still vote for that GOP nominee.

What will you do should Donald Trump prevail?

Vote Trump

52 posted on 04/18/2016 12:30:00 PM PDT by sargon (No king but Christ!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: nathanbedford

Supreme Court is in play.

That is all that matter now. . .does anyone want hitlery or bernie to make the next three SCOTUS picks?


60 posted on 04/18/2016 2:02:36 PM PDT by Hulka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson