Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WhiskeyX

Every state that has looked at Ted Cruz’s eligibility has declared him to be eligible.
Just because there are some people who don’t agree with those court rulings doesn’t alter the fact that no jurisdiction has declared him to be ineligible.
Neither of Ted Cruz’s primary election opponents, Kaisch or Trump has challenged Cruz’s eligibility in court or before a state elections board.

Roger Calero is a naturalzed U.S. citizen.


96 posted on 04/17/2016 10:29:39 PM PDT by Nero Germanicus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]


To: Nero Germanicus

“Every state that has looked at Ted Cruz’s eligibility has declared him to be eligible.”

False statement again. Almost all of the courts dismissed the cases on the basis of the plaintiff not having standing and/or the court not having jurisdiction over the complaint/s. The few that did make a decision did so without discovery, without a jury trial, and without any meaningful opportunity to introduce evidence before an independent trier of fact. Furthermore none of the court proceedings have the authority to overrule the prior U.S. Supreme Court decisions in which it was stated such persons either did not acquire any U.S. citizenship or could acquire only naturalized citizenship. These inferior courts do not have the authority to rewrite the Constitution at their pleasure nor the natural law from which natural born citizenship arises.

“Just because there are some people who don’t agree with those court rulings doesn’t alter the fact that no jurisdiction has declared him to be ineligible.”

Many of the same things can be said about Obamacare and a great many other unconstitutional rulings coming out of today’s corrupt judiciary and legislatures. That in no way changes the fact the courts have the lawful authority to allow a foreign born citizen to be on a ballot for election as President or to actually become inaugurated as President in the fashion of Barack Hussein Obama, who is another unlawful actor in this destruction of the Constitution and its rule of law.

“Neither of Ted Cruz’s primary election opponents, Kaisch or Trump has challenged Cruz’s eligibility in court or before a state elections board.”

Of course they did not, because they know full well the Republican party is stonewalling the eligibility issue and has been since 1880 or earlier.

“Roger Calero is a naturalzed U.S. citizen.”

Since when? “Calero has been a lawful permanent resident of the United States (holding a green card) since 1990 (Wikipedia).”


101 posted on 04/17/2016 11:22:45 PM PDT by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

To: Nero Germanicus

CORRECTION

That in no way changes the fact the courts [do not] have the lawful authority to allow a foreign born citizen to be on a ballot for election as President or to actually become inaugurated as President in the fashion of Barack Hussein Obama, who is another unlawful actor in this destruction of the Constitution and its rule of law.


102 posted on 04/17/2016 11:24:31 PM PDT by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

To: Nero Germanicus
So your answer is that "because the courts say so, it must therefore be true."

Yeah, well they used to say "Separate but Equal." Was that true because courts said so?

You may be surprised to discover there are those of us out here who can think for ourselves, and are not dependent upon the courts to make up our minds for us.

Courts have a long history of getting things exactly wrong.

116 posted on 04/18/2016 6:29:43 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson