Which, I will reiterate, is a highly unlikely statistical result. And when a result is so far from the results one would statistically expect, the assumption is that something happened to skew those results.
Someone has been posting that it is legal to buy the support of delegates. And Cruz is taking special interest money to run his campaign. Hmm.
Not at all. Trump's campaign was not active in helping his supporters navigate the process, knowing when each event was, getting people selected at the first level (which was required for them to participate at later levels), etc. You can't evaluate the results of a caucus system like you would a primary. A caucus requires much more intentional participation.
What happened to skew the results is that Trump's campaign didn't know what they were doing, and so they couldn't help his supporters get chosen.
Someone has been posting that it is legal to buy the support of delegates.
More unsubstantiated allegations, hmmm? Your candidate screwed up, and instead of acknowledging that, you have to believe that someone cheated. Pitiful.