Here’s what I posted, over on the Sunday talk thread, recapping what Newt said (on Maria’s show)....
Newt saying if Trump wins NY by 60%, it’s pretty much over...Trump will be the presumptive nominee.
Regarding CA....big....could have effect, as cRuz has worked the key Congressional districts. But...that national waves can drown local media. If cRuz is seen as part of the (insider/establishment) problem, that drowns out any local efforts.
Also, if cRuz loses NY, CT, NJ, PA...etc....then he only continues to fade with his ‘we’re winning’ talk.
~~~~~
FYI...I almost fell out of my chair, when a WSJ board member - who was a panelist on, after Newt, said....”Look, the RNC is a private party....there is no law that says they HAVE to vote”.
They were discussing the (stolen) delegate situation...and how the rules are the rules. When she said votes aren’t needed, I was shocked....they’re not even hiding their inclusiveness, any longer :(
Was it Mary Kissel?
Or was it Kimberley Strassel?
I am not sure which is the most virulent anti-Trump!
>>When she said votes aren’t needed, I was shocked....they’re not even hiding their inclusiveness, any longer :(
I know!
What no one seems to answer is, HOW is it legal/Constitutional/moral for two PRIVATE organizations to hold the American People and their votes HOSTAGE to these two private parties?
Why are two private parties allowed to make their own private rules resulting in Voter Disenfranchisement? When did they perpetrate their coup of the United States of America?
More and more, I read posters answer that “when” question with: November 22, 1963